Bachelor of Secondary Education Major in English, Cordova Public College
Student Research
Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is used to examine the power and ideologies embedded in language use, especially in political contexts. Using Critical Discourse Analysis, researchers are enabled to explore how language functions as a tool for influence and control in political discourses. This study analyzed commentary videos of politicians on Vice President Sara Duterte’s impeachment trial to examine how language reflects power and ideology in political discourse. Using a qualitative-exploratory design and Fairclough’s three-dimensional model of Critical Discourse Analysis, it focused on selected YouTube videos of politicians discussing the issue. The findings revealed strategic use of the pronoun “we,” with pro-impeachment groups using it negatively to demand urgent action, while anti-impeachment groups used it positively to highlight fairness. Modal verbs like “will” and “can” were used to shape public perception. Assertive and declarative speech acts helped construct narratives and justify actions. Pro-impeachment groups used language strategically to frame Duterte’s 2030 candidacy as a national threat and emphasized constitutional duty. In contrast, anti-impeachment politicians framed the trial as politically motivated. The study recommends that political leaders, media, and the public be critically aware of language use to promote transparency, avoid misinformation, and encourage balanced democratic discourse.
Critical Discourse Analysis, Commentary videos, Ideology, Impeachment, Power
Cordova Public College
[1] A. C. MUÑEZ, M. J. B. BARRERA, M. K. O. ABAQUITA, C. S. AMORIN, J. V. E. ARADILLOS, and A. R. L. GUADALQUIVER, “A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS: COMMENTARY VIDEOS ON VICE PRESIDENT SARA’S IMPEACHMENT TRIAL,” unpublished student research, Cordova Public College, 2025.
